Someone on your team sent an AI-written number to a customer this week. Who would have caught it?

The draft read well. It went out. Nobody asked where the number came from, until the customer did.

AI SkillScreen is a 25-minute readiness assessment for the people who use AI at work and do not write code. Pilots are being set up now.

Thursday, 4:40

There is no datasheet.

The assistant wrote the line. Sam assumed it came from somewhere. Nine people on your team send drafts like this all week.

What AI SkillScreen finds

The person who would have circled it.

Same email, everyone on the team, 25 minutes: what would you check before sending? Back comes a level in each area, the evidence, and one short module for the gap. No overall score.

Sample 01 · The email, as sentFictional

Tod.okafor@northfield-plastics.exampleFromquotes@yourcompany.exampleSubjectRe: Line 4 controller, revised quote

Draft · AI assisted

Hi Dana,

Thanks for the quick turnaround on the specs. Revised quote attached for the MC-410 controller with the extended I/O module. Lead time is 3 weeks from PO.

One thing worth flagging: the MC-410 is certified to cut changeover time by 40%.

The payback on the upgrade should land inside the first quarter. Let me know if you want me to hold the September pricing.

Best,
Sam

not on the datasheet. The assistant made it up.

Same email, three people, before sending

Priya S.Circled it, asked for the source.Ready
Jordan R.Sent it to a manager.Ready with guardrails
Sam K.Hit send.Needs training

02Before and after

Before

You find out who checks AI output from a customer, one bad email at a time, weeks late.

After

Twenty-five minutes per person. A level in each area, the sentence they wrote as the evidence, one 12-minute module for the gap. You knew by Friday.

03How it works

Built for your team in an afternoon. Taken in 25 minutes.

You describe how the team works

The tools people are allowed to use, the tasks they do with them, the data that must never enter an AI, and who approves what.

Team profile, excerptApproved assistant: Claude Team. Never enters AI: customer bank details, unredacted POs. Quotes over $25k: sales manager approves.

Scenarios are rewritten to it

Each item starts from a published skill objective and is rewritten around your tools and rules. You approve the set before anyone is invited.

Scenario, rewrittenA customer’s PO PDF includes bank details. You want line items out of it. Best next step?

People take it, you see evidence

About 25 minutes, untimed. Four formats: pick the next step, spot the risk in a draft, order a prompt, write one.

Result, one areaData handling: Ready with guardrails. Redacted before upload; did not say who checks the total. Next: Verifying extracted figures, 12 min.

04Try one

Questions look like Tuesday afternoon on your team.

Pick an answer and read why. The explanations depend on the assumptions below, which is the point: in the product they are your assumptions, and the best answer moves with them.

Assumed policy for this sample: One approved assistant, provided by the company. Customer bank details, tax IDs, and personal phone numbers never enter any AI tool. Redacted documents may be uploaded to the approved assistant.
What it is testing: Data handling: whether someone can get the useful work out of an AI tool without putting the sensitive part in.
What it is not: A live assessment. Nothing you pick here is sent or stored.

Sample scenario · Data handling · Nothing is sent or scored

A customer’s purchase order in the chat

A customer emails a purchase order PDF. It includes their tax ID, bank details, and a contact’s mobile number. You want the assistant to pull out the line items and quantities. What is the best next step?

Choose the best next step

Upload the PDF to the approved assistant and ask for line items only.
Paste the full PO into a free consumer chatbot; it handles PDFs well.
Redact the tax ID, bank details, and phone number, then upload to the approved assistant.
Type the line items out by hand; AI should never see customer documents.

In a real sitting this item is rewritten with your tools and your rules, and the explanation is shown to the person afterwards.

05Results

What a manager gets: levels by area, the evidence, and the next step.

Priya S. · SalesReport excerpt · September sitting · Fictional

PromptingReady

Ordered a four-part prompt correctly and wrote one that named the audience, the format, and the source to use. Draft a two-paragraph reply for a procurement lead, using only the attached spec.

Checking outputReady

Flagged the unsupported claim in the sample draft and named what she would check it against. The datasheet, and if it isn’t there, it doesn’t go in the email.

Data handlingReady with guardrails

Redacted the PO before upload. Not established: whether she checks extracted totals against the ERP before they reach a quote.

Next: Verifying extracted figures, 12 min, then a 4-question retake on this area.

WorkflowNeeds training

Chose to automate the approval step rather than the drafting step.

Next: Where the human stays in the loop, 15 min.

2Three levels per area. Ready means they work independently there. Ready with guardrails means productive with a review step. Needs training assigns one module.

3“Not established” means the sitting did not establish it, never that the person cannot do it. A short retake on one area updates one level.

Sample 02 · The team view: one row per person, one level per area, after one sitting. Fictional team, example data.
Person	Prompt	Check	Tools	Flow	Setup	Data	Fix
Jordan R.	R	G	R	R	G	R	R
Priya S.	R	R	R	G	R	R	R
Marcus B.	G	T	R	G	T	G	G
Elena O.	R	G	G	R	R	T	R
Tom N.	R	R	R	R	G	R	R
Derek W.	G	T	G	T	T	T	G

RReadyGReady with guardrailsTNeeds training

4One level per area, per person. Nothing is added up into a single number, because a person who is Ready at prompting and Needs training at data handling is not “72%”. They are someone who should not be uploading documents yet.

5Levels drive training, not performance reviews. A whole amber column means the team needs the same module, which is the point of the view.

06Who it’s for

Assessment tools test developers. Your AI risk is everywhere else.

HackerRank, CoderPad, and their peers test code. They cannot tell you whether a salesperson or an operations lead can work safely with AI tools, connectors, and workflows. AI SkillScreen is built for those roles first, and covers the AI-facing technical roles too.

SalesQuotes, customer replies, and what may leave the company in a draft.
OperationsProcess documents, hand-offs, and which step should stay with a person.
Customer serviceDrafted responses, escalation, and knowing when the assistant is guessing.
ProductResearch synthesis, specs, and checking what the assistant claims a source says.
Purchasing and financeSupplier documents, figures pulled from PDFs, and what gets verified before it is booked.
AI architects and developersTool design, context, permissions, and failure handling, on the same track as the Claude certifications.

Where the questions come fromFour skill tracks (AI at Work, AI Developer, AI Builder, AI Architect), 27 domains, and 100+ published sub-objectives from the leading AI certification blueprints, already a 1,200-item bank on our sister site, aicertificates.study.
Rewritten to your teamEach item is adapted to your profile and approved by you before anyone is invited.
Separate from hiringThe employee assessment is self-serve. Hiring screens for AI-facing roles are a different, manager-led interview workspace, on the Company plan.

07Pricing

A seat is one assessed person. Retakes are free.

Feature	Starter$49/ month	Team$79/ month	CompanyLet’s talk
SeatsOne assessed person each	Up to 15	Up to 40	As many as you need
Teams	One	Up to five	Unlimited
Skill tracks	All four	All four	All four
Levels, learning plan, retakes	Included	Included	Included
Company rollup across teams	Not included	Included	Included
Scenario editor and progress over time	Not included	Included	Included
SSO and LMS sync	Not included	Not included	Included
Hiring screens for AI-facing rolesManager-led interview workspace, separate from the employee assessment	Not included	Not included	Included
	Keep me posted	Keep me posted	Get in touch

Incumbent assessment tools run roughly $80 to $400+ per month and test developers only.

08Stay in the loop

Pilots are being set up now. Want to hear when they open?

Leave an email and you get the details first: how a pilot runs, what a team needs to provide, and what comes back. One or two emails, then only when there is something to say.

Details first, then only when there is news. No drip sequence.

25minutes per employee, untimed
3levels per area, no overall score
0coding questions